You ran the study. You analysed the data. You wrote it all up. And then the rejection came – with feedback that barely mentioned your methodology. Sounds familiar? In this article, I break down what editors and reviewers are actually looking for – from how you frame your research question to how you position your work within the existing literature – so you can address the writing pitfalls that weaken sturdy science.

Strong science isn’t automatically linked to clear communication. In this article, Patrícia Paes de Sousa looks at the role of scientific writing in shaping how evidence is understood, interpreted, and applied.