Scientific writing: turning complex evidence into clear messages that work for your audience
- Patrícia Paes de Sousa
- Jan 25
- 4 min read
Strong science isn’t automatically linked to clear communication. In this article, I look at the role of scientific writing in shaping how evidence is understood, interpreted, and applied.
If you work in healthcare, pharma, or research, you constantly generate data and insights. But turning those results into clear, accurate, and persuasive content for different audiences is another job altogether. That’s where scientific writing comes in.
What is scientific writing?
Scientific writing is the process of turning complex data, methods, and results into structured, accurate, and readable content, tailored to a specific purpose and audience. It helps bridge the gap between researchers, clinicians, decision-makers, and the public by presenting information in a way that is both scientifically sound and easy to understand.
A scientific writer combines subject-matter knowledge with advanced writing and editing skills. Every claim is supported by evidence, and every section has a clear function in the overall narrative. This goes beyond “well written”. It means shaping content that withstand peer review, regulatory scrutiny, and real-world use.
Common challenges in scientific writing
Even when the science is solid, communication often becomes the bottleneck. Manuscripts can go through multiple rounds of revision. Conference abstracts may be accurate but fail to convey why the work matters. Reports written for expert audiences are hard to reuse for regulators, funders, or non-specialists.
In many cases, the problem isn’t the data. It’s how information is selected, organized, and framed for the people who need to use it.
What kind of content does scientific writing cover?
Scientific writing spans a wide range of materials you may already be producing or planning, such as:
Journal articles and reviews: original research, narrative reviews, systematic reviews, short communications.
Conference materials: abstracts, e-posters, slide decks, oral presentation scripts.
Study documentation: protocols, clinical or preclinical study reports, and other technical documents.
Grant and funding applications: from research proposals to impact summaries and lay abstracts.
Educational and outreach materials: patient information leaflets, explainer articles, FAQs, and training modules.
Web and marketing content: white papers, case studies, or product pages that must remain scientifically accurate.
Each type of content has its own conventions, compliance requirements, and audience expectations. A scientific writer guides you through this demanding landscape, turning complex evidence into clear messages that work for your audience.
Take a single study result:
A clinical study shows a statistically significant reduction in symptom frequency after 12 weeks of treatment.
In a journal article, the focus is on methods, statistics, confidence intervals, and limitations, so readers can judge the strength of the evidence.
In a conference abstract, space is tight, so the emphasis shifts to the research question, the main outcome, and why it’s relevant.
In a patient-facing summary, the same finding needs to be explained in plain language, with context about what the improvement may mean in everyday life and what is still uncertain.
The evidence doesn’t change. What changes is the structure, level of detail, and language. Scientific writing is about making those choices deliberately, rather than rewriting the same text over and over.
Why does scientific writing matter for you and your team?
Unclear or poorly structured scientific communication can slow down publication, weaken key messages, or undermine trust in your work.
Clear, well-designed scientific content helps you:
Improve publication or approval success rates by presenting information in the right format, with the right level of detail and documentation.
Strengthen scientific and brand credibility through precise terminology, consistent messaging, and transparent reporting of methods and results.
Reach the right people – from reviewers and regulators to clinicians, patients, or partners – with content that fits their needs and expectations.
In summary, scientific writing helps turn findings into real-world decisions and action.
Why work with a scientific writer?
Teams are often under intense pressure to deliver results while managing demanding workloads. Adding the responsibility of producing several types of scientific content can easily overstretch resources and lead to communication gaps.
Working with a scientific writer allows them to use time more effectively and focus their attention on science and care while communication tasks are handled by a specialist.
Remember: Communicating science goes beyond producing a “polished text.” Scientific writers understand both the context and the communication challenges you face, which means that they:
Translate complex findings into clear, structured narratives without sacrificing scientific accuracy.
Ensure that terminology, references, and data are consistent and aligned with current standards and guidelines.
Adapt the same core content for different audiences – for example, turning a technical report into a journal article, a conference abstract, and a lay summary.
Collaborate with internal teams (research, regulatory, marketing, medical affairs) to make sure every piece of communication supports broader goals.
In practice, this usually means fewer rounds of revision, clearer feedback, and smoother approval processes. More broadly, it helps ensure that the way your work is communicated reflects the quality of the science behind it – whether you’re preparing a publication, applying for funding, or sharing results with a wider audience.
Ultimately, good scientific writing makes sure strong evidence doesn’t lose its impact once it leaves the lab or the page.
Patrícia is an English to Portuguese scientific and technical writer. With a PhD in (Bio)Chemistry and 25 years of experience in scientific research, she translates, writes, and reviews content in the fields of Chemistry and Life Sciences.
Comments